From deebbb044d02876b924deb689b7b0b7c3f889ede Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Haensler <adrian@chronicled.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:02:47 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] add a test

---
 tests/compiled/test_for_loop_py3.8.3.10.pyc | Bin 0 -> 611 bytes
 tests/input/test_for_loop_py3.8.py          |  19 +++++++++++++++++++
 tests/tokenized/test_for_loop_py3.8.txt     |  13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/compiled/test_for_loop_py3.8.3.10.pyc
 create mode 100644 tests/input/test_for_loop_py3.8.py
 create mode 100644 tests/tokenized/test_for_loop_py3.8.txt

diff --git a/tests/compiled/test_for_loop_py3.8.3.10.pyc b/tests/compiled/test_for_loop_py3.8.3.10.pyc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..473b3f804459f30aae4be9377886b3670410dc56
GIT binary patch
literal 611
zcmY*W&2H2%5VrTHtSqh66I|!W9+E(j03n1pR7hM<MSEHaMNaH&qB<F4JEZBY>eKKF
zJjz};z=c=ffEe#~`LQ)4fAjl|2bW91=$wA}UVP<@eT(4VGbQkv#6Kma*qSM>_~pb2
z&DG?V^8<dMrl;(~Vm%@IEZRRFtNA&LvO1DCR9Xb>LtdfF4WiATq|Z}3LXv>T-jy1n
zTf9M+M7M`pe$r6ZvfF3{O$T-iHFglw;G*7#gX|QXy%!Jb5UhWZWt%3{eUX;fX4g($
zWp*r8nc3c$?Bv;_6-cG1U8}+O)}jlkcpE?(k5DyN+Jgk^urRuXfhs{qlw$WP*>xiB
zP#7#PeJaF7-S`7_dRgfLU<HAwDNO|IXzob*z6qK#{+cOX!r6YHVhlPdQ6176qn$X{
z8sbbe(l89^26dqgMRmS6Ayqp2Q!9hWO5xBMlq%8`(NOh{m^k`4Lahu9cH##ufvt~r
z6Fgo|E5ti+@@_TV-pg}^Wu9;6)-_$&a`~CLIc4nB&-?#x&yM^3Z5J<FRK3x!VsU>=
QYQ`4J1&>$o*{>P@4FbBkYybcN

literal 0
HcmV?d00001

diff --git a/tests/input/test_for_loop_py3.8.py b/tests/input/test_for_loop_py3.8.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bad3ee7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/input/test_for_loop_py3.8.py
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+"""
+test_for_loop_3.8.py -- source test
+For-loops have changed in python 3.8. The test and PR
+(https://github.com/zrax/pycdc/pull/270) add some support.
+It also fixes a problem with nested if- and for blocks.
+
+This source is part of the decompyle test suite.
+
+decompyle is a Python byte-code decompiler
+See http://www.goebel-consult.de/decompyle/ for download and
+for further information
+"""
+
+if 1 == 1:
+    print('block1')
+if 1 == 1:
+    for a in 'foo':
+        print('block2')
+return None
diff --git a/tests/tokenized/test_for_loop_py3.8.txt b/tests/tokenized/test_for_loop_py3.8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0fd636a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tokenized/test_for_loop_py3.8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+'\ntest_for_loop_3.8.py -- source test\nFor-loops have changed in python 3.8. The test and PR\n(https://github.com/zrax/pycdc/pull/270) add some support.\nIt also fixes a problem with nested if- and for blocks.\n\nThis source is part of the decompyle test suite.\n\ndecompyle is a Python byte-code decompiler\nSee http://www.goebel-consult.de/decompyle/ for download and\nfor further information\n' <EOL>
+if 1 == 1 : <EOL>
+<INDENT>
+print ( 'block1' ) <EOL>
+<OUTDENT>
+if 1 == 1 : <EOL>
+<INDENT>
+for a in 'foo' : <EOL>
+<INDENT>
+print ( 'block2' ) <EOL>
+<OUTDENT>
+<OUTDENT>
+return None <EOL>